H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 0-4
Pavel Slozil holds a 4–0 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pavel Slozil leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1984 Cologne third round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1984* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pavel Slozil | 7-6 6-1 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1984* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Pavel Slozil | 6-2 6-2 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| May 28, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 3-6 7-6 7-5 6-7 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1979* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 6-2 6-1 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |