H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Raymond Moore H2H: 1-1
Balazs Taroczy and Raymond Moore are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Raymond Moore won the 1981 Madrid third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1981* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raymond Moore | 6-3 6-0 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1981* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-3 6-1 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Raymond Moore | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,892 | 357 | 376 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Raymond Moore | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 35–23 | 60.3% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 32–39 | 45.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 17–28 | 37.8% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 36–36 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #39 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 35–30 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #138 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | 1979 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #99 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #112 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #100 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |