H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Rick Fagel H2H: 2-0
Balazs Taroczy holds a 2–0 lead over Rick Fagel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Balazs Taroczy leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1981 Rome third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1981* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-2 6-2 | Rick Fagel | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1977* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-0 6-2 | Rick Fagel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Rick Fagel | #759 | #60 | 0 | 1,614 | 47 | 99 | 32.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Rick Fagel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #135 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #113 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #135 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #99 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1982 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |