H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Belus Prajoux vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-0
Belus Prajoux holds a 2–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belus Prajoux leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Belus Prajoux won the 1978 South Orange third round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 71
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1978* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Belus Prajoux | 6-0 7-5 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1977* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Belus Prajoux | 7-6 7-5 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belus Prajoux | #941 | #62 | 0 | 1,729 | 81 | 128 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belus Prajoux | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #116 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1975 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1979 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #111 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1980 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #154 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #154 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |