H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Ben Qiang Zhu vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Ben Qiang Zhu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 1999 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-4 6-2.

CHN Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-4 6-2 Ben Qiang Zhu #591 Match data Oct 7, 1999* R32 Shanghai Masters ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ben Qiang Zhu #1,630 #276 104 1,500 1 5 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Van Lottum 1,719 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ben Qiang Zhu John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1999 0–1 0.0% #643 1,489 0 0
2000 0–1 0.0% #411 1,483 0 0
2003 0–1 0.0% #377 1,471 0 0
2004 1–2 33.3% #430 1,461 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ben Qiang Zhu John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1999 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
2004 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
2006 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 1 5 6 16.7% Career 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Ben Qiang Zhu John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
2000 1/1 1.0 5.0 54.0% 55.6% 34.8% 50.0% 46.0% 24.3% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
2003 1/1 2.0 2.0 45.0% 81.5% 48.5% 81.8% 63.3% 24.1% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
2004 3/3 5.7 3.0 61.3% 66.0% 50.0% 63.9% 50.0% 59.2% 24.9% 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ben Qiang Zhu John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1999 1489 100.8 0.0% -3.00 +0.07 1996 1491 106.9 0.0% -3.75 -0.35
2000 1483 99.7 +0.61 +0.32 0.450 36.8% 0.0% -4.50 -0.10 1997 1631 121.6 -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
2003 1471 101.3 -1.87 -2.32 0.657 44.7% 0.0% -2.50 +0.10 1998 1612 120.7 -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
2004 1462 95.8 -2.83 -2.17 0.610 44.3% +23 28.6% -2.00 1–0 0–1 +0.57 1999 1662 128.3 +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
2000 1517 104.0 +57 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 +0.38
2001 1584 111.2 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 -0.48
2002 1624 118.0 -2 -68 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 +0.19
2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.12
Career 1500 98.7 -1.95 -1.70 0.578 42.9% +23 15.4% -2.62 1–0 0–1 +10.67 Career 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.