H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Go Soeda H2H: 1-0
Benjamin Becker holds a 1–0 lead over Go Soeda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2009 Indianapolis third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 6-2 6-3 | Go Soeda | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Go Soeda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |