H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 0-1
Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2013 Zagreb third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2016* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Benjamin Becker | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2013* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-2 7-6(3) | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |