H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Benjamin Becker vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 0-1

Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2013 Zagreb round of 32 6-2 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Benjamin Becker #92 4-6 6-0 6-3 Ivan Dodig #75 Match data May 1, 2016* Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Ivan Dodig #63 6-2 7-6(3) Benjamin Becker #56 Match data Feb 7, 2013* R32 Zagreb ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Benjamin Becker Ivan Dodig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0
25 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0
26 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1
27 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1
28 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1
29 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1
30 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1
31 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1
32 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1
33 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Benjamin Becker Ivan Dodig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's and 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Benjamin Becker Ivan Dodig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0%
25 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2% 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5%
26 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2% 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9%
27 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3% 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0%
28 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1% 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4%
29 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0% 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2%
30 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9% 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9%
31 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8% 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9%
32 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0% 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9%
33 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6% — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Benjamin Becker Ivan Dodig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48
25 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
26 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33
27 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32
28 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81
29 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01
30 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31
31 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02
32 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39
33 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39
Career — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32 — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.