H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Jan Hernych H2H: 0-1
Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2007 Las Vegas round-robin match 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2007 | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | RR | Hard | Jan Hernych | 6-3 7-5 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |