H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-2
Steve Darcis holds a 2–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2008 Munich third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Steve Darcis | 6-3 6-4 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2008* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Steve Darcis | 6-1 6-0 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |