H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Benjamin Becker vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 1-0

Benjamin Becker holds a 1–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2007 Japan Open first round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Benjamin Becker #58 7-5 3-6 6-4 Takao Suzuki #216 Match data Oct 3, 2007* R64 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Benjamin Becker Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0
33 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Benjamin Becker Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Benjamin Becker Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8% 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0% 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
33 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Benjamin Becker Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.13
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.05
30 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.