H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 2-0
Benjamin Becker holds a 2–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Benjamin Becker leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2014 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 6-3 6-3 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2014 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 7-5 6-1 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2013 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 7-5 7-6(2) | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2012* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Tatsuma Ito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |