H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Ivan Ljubicic H2H: 0-2
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 2–0 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2011 Rotterdam fourth round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-0 6-4 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(5) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Ivan Ljubicic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |