H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-0
Benoit Paire holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2012 Auckland fourth round 5-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2012* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Benoit Paire | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |