H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-2
Benoit Paire and Lukas Rosol are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 Auckland fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-4 7-6(5) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2016* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Benoit Paire | 7-5 7-5 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lukas Rosol | 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-3 7-5 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |