H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-1
Benoit Paire and Nikolay Davydenko are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on clay, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2013 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(8) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2013* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2013* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-3 6-1 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Nikolay Davydenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |