H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 0-3
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 3–0 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2016 Paris Masters second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2016* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-4 7-6(4) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2013* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2012* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-4 6-4 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |