H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 0-4
Tomas Berdych holds a 4–0 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2019 Montpellier fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2019* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-2 6-0 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2018* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| May 30, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2012* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 7-6(6) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Tomas Berdych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |