H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs John Isner H2H: 1-0
Bernabe Zapata Miralles holds a 1–0 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernabe Zapata Miralles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bernabe Zapata Miralles won the 2022 Roland Garros third round 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Bernabe Zapata Miralles | 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | John Isner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | #491 | #37 | 1,051 | 1,809 | 36 | 62 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernabe Zapata Miralles | John Isner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #266 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #272 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #451 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 |