H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-1

Bernard Tomic and Aljaz Bedene are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay, while Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2019 Budapest round of 32 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Aljaz Bedene
SLO Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aljaz Bedene #74 7-6(5) 6-4 Bernard Tomic #77 Match data Apr 25, 2019* R32 Budapest ATP 250 Clay
Bernard Tomic #23 6-4 6-3 Aljaz Bedene #58 Match data Jun 11, 2016* R16 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Aljaz Bedene #1,030 #43 1,169 1,893 131 160 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Aljaz Bedene
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2011 1–1 50.0% #165 1,598 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2012 3–4 42.9% #86 1,627 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2013 11–18 37.9% #95 1,631 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2014 5–9 35.7% #145 1,671 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2015 17–17 50.0% #45 1,777 0 0
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2016 12–19 38.7% #101 1,740 0 0
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2017 19–18 51.4% #49 1,816 0 0
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2018 17–19 47.2% #67 1,733 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 18–18 50.0% #58 1,844 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 10–12 45.5% #58 1,798 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 15–15 50.0% #109 1,773 0 0
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2022 3–10 23.1% #347 1,660 0 0
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Aljaz Bedene
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 10 16 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 2 7 9 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 11 19 42.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2022 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 57 74 131 43.5% 61 64 125 48.8% 13 22 35 37.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Aljaz Bedene
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2011 2/2 9.0 2.5 60.2% 81.9% 49.2% 42.9% 33.3% 69.0% 28.3%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2012 7/7 5.6 3.6 56.4% 71.7% 41.5% 62.9% 49.7% 57.7% 34.3%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2013 29/29 7.9 3.7 57.4% 72.6% 50.5% 49.4% 43.5% 62.9% 36.7%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2014 14/14 8.8 3.1 53.1% 71.5% 45.5% 45.9% 48.1% 59.5% 33.9%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2015 34/34 8.1 2.9 54.0% 76.1% 48.8% 58.9% 43.1% 63.5% 35.6%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2016 31/31 9.1 2.9 57.4% 73.7% 49.6% 55.2% 42.1% 63.3% 35.5%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2017 37/37 7.9 2.0 59.3% 73.4% 52.1% 55.4% 40.6% 64.8% 36.3%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2018 36/36 8.1 2.2 57.6% 72.3% 49.3% 59.6% 32.0% 62.3% 37.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/36 9.4 3.2 57.1% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 45.0% 63.9% 35.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 9.4 3.7 56.7% 77.7% 45.9% 56.2% 31.1% 64.3% 30.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 30/30 8.2 3.6 54.2% 75.6% 50.8% 54.9% 41.8% 64.1% 36.6%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2022 13/13 8.7 4.8 54.8% 72.7% 45.1% 58.4% 39.4% 60.0% 32.5%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 290/291 8.4 3.0 56.5% 74.1% 49.1% 55.9% 40.7% 63.2% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Aljaz Bedene
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2010 1510 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2011 1598 111.4 -3.13 +1.53 0.912 49.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.14
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2012 1628 112.4 -0.63 -2.09 0.811 46.5% +15 -14 — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2013 1631 135.7 -0.57 -0.46 0.989 49.7% -24 +25 -80 43.4% -0.46 3–9 (25%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.37
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2014 1671 125.5 -2.62 -1.76 0.838 46.8% +7 +10 — 29.4% -1.21 4–2 (67%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.18
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2015 1777 143.0 -0.50 -0.29 0.974 49.4% +5 -47 -158 45.2% -0.30 7–2 (78%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.03
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2016 1740 139.8 -0.05 -0.03 0.968 49.2% +1 -8 -110 41.0% -0.41 6–8 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.06
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2017 1816 141.4 +0.23 +0.59 1.031 49.9% -96 -15 -84 50.6% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.31
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2018 1733 146.7 -0.98 +1.27 0.996 49.7% -89 +112 -31 46.8% -0.17 9–9 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.19
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1844 145.1 +0.02 -0.45 0.970 49.6% -71 -22 -134 51.6% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.41
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1799 141.8 +0.66 -2.51 0.855 47.5% -20 +2 — 46.3% -0.15 4–1 (80%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.46
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1774 129.1 +0.73 -0.73 1.019 50.0% -1 -14 -65 49.4% -0.03 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.98
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2022 1661 118.5 -2.51 -2.70 0.811 46.8% +31 +88 — 36.6% -0.76 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.07
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1893 144.0 -0.36 -0.42 0.960 49.1% -29 +18 -94 45.4% -0.25 53–52 (50%) 66–68 (49%) 101.6 -1.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.