H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Andy Roddick H2H: 0-1
Andy Roddick holds a 1–0 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2012 US Open second round 6-3 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 6-0 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |