H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 1-2
Benjamin Becker holds a 2–1 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2015 Acapulco fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2015* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| May 4, 2014 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Benjamin Becker | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2013* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Benjamin Becker | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(4) | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2010* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Benjamin Becker | 6-4 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Benjamin Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |