H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 1-1
Bernard Tomic and Carlos Berlocq are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay, while Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2012 US Open first round 4-6 7-5 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 4-6 7-5 6-3 6-4 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Carlos Berlocq | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Carlos Berlocq | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |