H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs David Ferrer H2H: 2-5

David Ferrer holds a 5–2 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 5–2 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2017 Brisbane third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 4, 2017* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #21 6-3 7-5 Bernard Tomic #26 Match data
Oct 14, 2015* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Bernard Tomic #20 6-4 6-2 David Ferrer #8 Match data
Mar 17, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Bernard Tomic #35 7-5 6-4 David Ferrer #8 Match data
Feb 27, 2015* Acapulco ATP 500 QF Hard David Ferrer #9 6-4 3-6 6-1 Bernard Tomic #42 Match data
Aug 29, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard David Ferrer #5 (w/o) Bernard Tomic #67 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Ferrer #5 6-4 6-4 Bernard Tomic #36 Match data
Sep 30, 2010* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R32 Hard David Ferrer #11 6-3 6-4 Bernard Tomic #218 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bernard Tomic #206 #17 1,885 1,968 170 182 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,790 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–25 46.8% #52 1,763 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,788 0 1 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,828 0 2 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,913 0 3 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,872 0 3 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,726 0 3 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,744 0 4 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,632 0 4 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,598 0 4 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,613 0 4 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 — — — — — — — 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,595 0 4 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 — — — — — — — 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 — — — — — — — 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 — — — — — — — 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27