H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 2-2
Bernard Tomic and Fabio Fognini are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Fabio Fognini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2018 Chengdu final 6-1 3-6 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2018* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| May 3, 2016* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 6-2 6-4 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2015* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-3 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2012* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Fabio Fognini | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Fabio Fognini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 |