H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 2-2

Bernard Tomic and Fabio Fognini are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Fabio Fognini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2018 Chengdu Open final 6-1 3-6 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #123 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) Fabio Fognini #13 Match data Sep 30, 2018* F Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard
Fabio Fognini #31 6-2 6-4 Bernard Tomic #22 Match data May 3, 2016* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Bernard Tomic #18 6-3 6-2 Fabio Fognini #22 Match data Nov 4, 2015* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Fabio Fognini #64 4-6 6-3 7-5 Bernard Tomic #27 Match data Jun 21, 2012* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Fabio Fognini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — —
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — — — — — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Fabio Fognini
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6%
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 775/787 3.3 4.0 59.0% 67.3% 48.4% 53.5% 44.2% 59.5% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Fabio Fognini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.26
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.25
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.15
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.90
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.82
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.45
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.35
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.89
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) — +2.30
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.93
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.17
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) — +2.85
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.99
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.91 +1.00 1.034 51.0% +28 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.27
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.20
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) — -0.21
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.27
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.