H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 6-1

Bernard Tomic holds a 6–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2018 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2018* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Bernard Tomic #181 6-4 7-6(3) Fernando Verdasco #34 Match data
Jun 29, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Bernard Tomic #19 4-6 6-3 6-3 3-6 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #53 Match data
Jun 17, 2016* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Bernard Tomic #22 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #53 Match data
Oct 13, 2015* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Bernard Tomic #20 6-3 7-6(3) Fernando Verdasco #42 Match data
Oct 18, 2014* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Bernard Tomic #76 0-6 6-4 7-6(6) Fernando Verdasco #36 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Bernard Tomic #38 4-6 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #24 Match data
Jan 7, 2009* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #15 6-4 6-2 Bernard Tomic #764 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bernard Tomic #206 #17 1,885 1,968 170 182 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,790 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2012 22–25 46.8% #52 1,763 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,788 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,828 0 2 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,913 0 3 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,872 0 3 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,726 0 3 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,744 0 4 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,632 0 4 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,598 0 4 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,613 0 4 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,595 0 4 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7