H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Florian Mayer H2H: 1-3

Florian Mayer holds a 3–1 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Florian Mayer leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Florian Mayer won the 2013 Canadian Open first round 5-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Florian Mayer
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florian Mayer #50 5-7 6-3 6-3 Bernard Tomic #41 Match data Aug 7, 2013* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Bernard Tomic #64 7-6(4) 6-2 Florian Mayer #28 Match data Jan 11, 2013* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Florian Mayer #25 6-4 6-0 Bernard Tomic #43 Match data Oct 9, 2012* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Florian Mayer #37 6-2 6-2 Bernard Tomic #208 Match data Jan 5, 2011* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Florian Mayer #256 #18 1,735 1,956 227 251 47.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Florian Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2004 19–17 52.8% #35 1,724 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2005 20–24 45.5% #72 1,723 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2006 24–21 53.3% #56 1,719 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2007 17–23 42.5% #55 1,618 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2008 2–9 18.2% #409 1,537 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2009 3–6 33.3% #61 1,666 0 0
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2010 21–19 52.5% #37 1,801 0 0
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2011 42–24 63.6% #23 1,940 0 1
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2012 19–24 44.2% #28 1,798 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2013 27–25 51.9% #40 1,861 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2014 7–7 50.0% #147 1,888 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2015 4–9 30.8% #217 1,790 0 1
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2016 10–11 47.6% #50 1,811 0 2
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2017 10–17 37.0% #69 1,760 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2018 2–15 11.8% #256 1,594 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Florian Mayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 23 15 38 60.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 13 15 28 46.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 5 5 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — — — — — 99 131 230 43.0% 86 90 176 48.9% 39 26 65 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 473/478 of Florian Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Florian Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2004 35/36 4.6 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 52.0% 58.7% 40.5% 62.2% 38.3%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2005 44/44 3.5 2.0 61.7% 67.4% 46.5% 53.8% 43.3% 59.4% 36.3%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2006 45/45 4.5 1.7 61.9% 72.5% 51.2% 52.6% 45.0% 64.2% 40.6%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2007 40/40 4.6 1.8 61.8% 68.4% 49.5% 47.5% 40.6% 61.2% 37.3%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2008 11/11 2.5 1.5 61.1% 63.4% 45.6% 47.0% 45.2% 56.5% 35.8%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2009 9/9 3.4 1.4 64.7% 67.8% 52.8% 50.1% 29.9% 62.7% 37.1%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2010 39/40 4.3 1.7 63.6% 71.3% 53.1% 64.5% 39.5% 64.4% 37.1%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2011 66/66 3.7 2.0 59.8% 71.3% 52.7% 58.4% 47.5% 63.6% 39.3%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2012 42/43 4.2 1.3 61.0% 70.9% 53.0% 57.4% 41.7% 63.7% 34.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 52/52 4.4 1.7 63.1% 68.4% 51.5% 55.8% 41.8% 62.2% 37.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 13/14 6.0 1.4 62.6% 66.6% 52.3% 60.8% 49.8% 61.3% 38.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 13/13 5.1 1.5 64.0% 64.3% 47.6% 58.8% 43.2% 58.3% 33.9%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2016 20/21 4.6 1.5 63.3% 71.2% 49.8% 53.8% 41.2% 63.3% 34.1%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2017 27/27 4.2 1.7 61.4% 69.6% 51.3% 61.8% 42.9% 62.5% 32.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 17/17 3.6 2.1 59.2% 65.5% 48.4% 59.0% 36.4% 58.5% 33.5%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 473/478 4.2 1.8 61.7% 69.4% 50.9% 56.3% 42.6% 62.2% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Florian Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2004 1725 137.2 +0.54 +1.23 1.014 50.1% -126 -13 -31 53.9% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.20
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2005 1724 137.0 -2.41 -0.72 0.893 48.1% -85 +5 +29 43.8% -0.60 7–3 (70%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.13
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2006 1720 136.8 +1.98 +2.41 1.131 52.0% -75 +52 +39 52.3% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.24
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2007 1619 134.0 -0.59 +0.75 0.962 49.0% +27 +49 +119 43.4% -0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.57
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2008 1538 114.4 -3.82 -1.01 0.823 46.3% +41 — — 22.7% -1.23 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.13
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2009 1667 132.6 -0.44 -0.02 0.994 49.6% +28 — — 39.1% -0.30 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.01
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2010 1801 152.2 +1.23 +0.62 1.044 50.8% -13 -82 +3 53.6% +0.29 8–5 (62%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.46
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2011 1941 154.2 +1.16 +2.09 1.081 51.2% -21 -47 -127 59.2% +0.39 9–4 (69%) 13–6 (68%) — +1.25
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2012 1799 150.3 +0.84 -1.03 0.960 49.3% -6 -9 +188 48.5% -0.12 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.65
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1861 153.3 -0.17 +0.37 0.978 49.6% -38 -39 +104 49.2% -0.08 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1889 146.1 -0.12 +1.13 0.988 49.5% -31 — — 56.8% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.70
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1790 121.4 -3.24 -0.95 0.812 46.4% — -41 +139 37.5% -1.09 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.28
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2016 1811 135.4 -0.43 -0.48 0.929 48.7% -17 -148 +181 40.4% -0.47 3–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.04
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2017 1760 136.7 -0.19 -1.94 0.865 48.0% -94 -20 +178 35.6% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–11 (8%) — -0.36
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1594 122.8 -3.14 -1.85 0.807 46.1% +12 +22 +258 20.9% -1.54 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.13
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1956 149.9 -0.06 +0.39 0.978 49.5% -29 -15 +102 47.6% -0.15 61–52 (54%) 71–87 (45%) 100.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.