H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Jurgen Zopp H2H: 1-0

Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Zopp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2011 Stockholm Open first round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jurgen Zopp
EST Age 38 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #44 7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 Jurgen Zopp #145 Match data Oct 20, 2011* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jurgen Zopp #1,406 #71 656 1,715 16 31 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Jurgen Zopp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2011 0–1 0.0% #146 1,562 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2012 7–11 38.9% #89 1,672 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2013 1–6 14.3% #334 1,610 0 0
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2014 1–2 33.3% #189 1,629 0 0
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2015 0–2 0.0% #163 1,600 0 0
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2016 1–2 33.3% #329 1,597 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #163 1,611 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 5–6 45.5% #143 1,599 0 0
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Jurgen Zopp
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 6 15 21 28.6% 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 47/47 of Jurgen Zopp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Jurgen Zopp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2011 1/1 6.0 4.0 55.1% 65.3% 57.5% 55.6% 25.0% 61.8% 32.7%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2012 18/18 4.9 2.5 60.9% 68.5% 49.5% 53.7% 35.4% 60.8% 35.8%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2013 7/7 3.6 4.4 57.0% 61.1% 39.8% 62.0% 40.7% 53.0% 32.2%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2014 3/3 3.7 2.7 59.3% 68.0% 50.2% 8.3% 62.5% 60.6% 21.6%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2015 2/2 3.0 1.5 64.1% 66.3% 50.4% 68.3% 0.0% 60.4% 24.5%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2016 3/3 5.7 3.3 64.4% 71.1% 51.9% 61.1% 13.3% 64.0% 33.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 7.0 2.5 58.8% 73.1% 44.6% 50.0% 50.0% 61.2% 33.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 11/11 5.7 2.3 60.5% 73.3% 49.9% 57.1% 36.3% 64.1% 32.0%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 47/47 4.9 2.8 60.3% 68.7% 48.4% 53.8% 35.6% 60.6% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Jurgen Zopp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 110.1 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 102.8 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.0 -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.73 2009 1497 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) 98.4 +2.35 2010 1506 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) 98.6 +2.21 2011 1562 114.9 -2.32 -0.40 0.855 46.3% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 98.6 -0.82 2012 1673 129.4 -1.18 -1.00 0.914 47.9% -32 -11 — 39.5% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +1.46
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) 102.2 +1.42 2013 1611 113.7 -2.66 -1.98 0.685 44.0% +2 — — 26.3% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.39
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.65 2014 1630 104.2 -0.71 -2.27 0.548 42.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.15
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2015 1601 110.9 -0.02 -3.75 0.619 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2016 1597 114.6 -0.16 -2.06 0.925 47.6% — — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1611 112.7 +0.06 +0.46 0.854 47.8% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1599 112.1 -0.70 -2.21 0.893 48.3% — +106 — 41.2% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 104.4 +0.93
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1548 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.86 +1.01 1.034 51.0% +28 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1716 120.9 -1.12 -1.62 0.830 46.8% -22 +51 — 34.7% -0.83 8–9 (47%) 3–9 (25%) 95.8 +3.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.