H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Mardy Fish H2H: 1-2
Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2011 Shanghai Masters third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2011* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2011* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mardy Fish | 6-3 7-6(8) 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Mardy Fish | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |