H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Mardy Fish H2H: 1-2

Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2011 Shanghai Masters second round 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #49 4-6 6-1 6-4 Mardy Fish #9 Match data Oct 12, 2011* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Mardy Fish #8 6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 Bernard Tomic #58 Match data Oct 8, 2011* QF Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Mardy Fish #73 6-3 7-6(8) 6-2 Bernard Tomic #246 Match data Jun 23, 2010* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,116 295 212 58.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2004 26–18 59.1% #37 1,760 0 1
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,640 0 1
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,726 0 2
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,755 0 2
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,860 0 2
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,815 0 3
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,023 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,012 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,935 0 6
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,885 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Mardy Fish
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2002 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2003 29 12 41 70.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2004 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 5 0 5 100.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 22 14 36 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 26 15 41 63.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 25 11 36 69.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 33 17 50 66.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — — — — — 221 151 372 59.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 46 26 72 63.9% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 452/465 of Mardy Fish's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Mardy Fish
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2003 58/61 11.0 3.9 53.4% 80.0% 52.0% 64.2% 39.2% 67.0% 35.1%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2004 38/44 11.1 4.1 55.1% 77.2% 50.8% 65.1% 42.1% 65.4% 35.2%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2005 17/17 10.3 3.4 53.9% 72.8% 46.5% 53.7% 34.0% 60.9% 34.2%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2006 40/41 9.5 3.1 51.8% 78.8% 53.9% 68.1% 43.9% 66.5% 37.5%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2007 45/45 11.4 2.7 52.2% 80.1% 52.1% 55.7% 42.6% 66.5% 35.7%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2008 55/55 10.1 2.7 49.3% 77.9% 51.8% 57.6% 39.2% 64.6% 36.6%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2009 37/38 11.0 2.3 56.9% 77.1% 53.3% 58.2% 44.0% 66.6% 36.9%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2010 52/53 10.9 2.3 55.3% 79.7% 54.6% 62.1% 49.8% 68.5% 38.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 64/64 7.6 1.7 58.4% 76.7% 55.4% 64.9% 44.7% 67.7% 39.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 31/32 9.7 2.5 52.2% 77.9% 55.4% 68.6% 51.3% 67.1% 39.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 9/9 5.8 3.1 49.6% 75.7% 47.6% 45.0% 44.4% 61.2% 37.2%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2015 6/6 8.3 3.8 52.2% 75.4% 46.3% 54.9% 43.2% 61.5% 40.9%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 452/507 10.0 2.8 53.9% 78.1% 52.8% 61.7% 43.4% 66.3% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Mardy Fish
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 2000 1524 106.9 — — — — -10 — +79 35.3% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.29
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 2001 1543 124.2 — — — — +34 — +26 37.8% -0.54 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.58
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2002 1630 123.4 — — — — +7 — -44 47.4% -0.32 4–3 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.37
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2003 1841 146.3 +3.97 -0.87 1.064 50.8% +36 -346 -162 57.3% +0.28 15–8 (65%) 18–18 (50%) — -0.62
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2004 1761 139.2 +1.62 -0.32 1.019 50.7% +14 — -26 54.0% +0.36 12–5 (71%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.83
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2005 1641 122.4 -1.17 -0.67 0.875 47.6% +31 — — 34.9% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.38
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2006 1727 137.0 +3.82 +0.31 1.121 52.1% -53 -159 +51 54.8% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.33
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2007 1756 144.3 +2.76 +0.38 1.067 51.0% +30 -208 -75 50.5% +0.02 8–6 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.23
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2008 1861 148.1 +1.58 +0.64 1.033 50.7% +50 -274 -175 56.0% +0.36 10–6 (63%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.64
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2009 1816 145.3 +2.33 +0.49 1.105 51.8% +26 -197 -21 55.3% +0.47 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.08
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2010 2023 156.7 +4.21 +2.02 1.209 53.0% +22 -393 -76 67.2% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 20–5 (80%) — +0.51
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2012 168.6 +4.73 +3.34 1.217 53.5% +6 -303 +46 64.1% +0.86 10–8 (56%) 14–10 (58%) — +1.88
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2013 152.5 +3.05 +2.62 1.209 53.3% +23 — +55 61.5% +0.88 5–2 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +2.93
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1936 131.0 -1.70 +0.61 0.959 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.10 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.20
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2015 1885 133.8 -0.64 +1.74 1.060 51.0% +16 — — 44.4% +0.61 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.26
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 2116 154.2 +2.92 +0.94 1.100 51.7% +19 -269 -43 55.6% +0.38 99–65 (60%) 107–118 (48%) 103.9 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.