H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-0
Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Bernard Tomic | 7-5 6-3 7-5 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Nikolay Davydenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 |