H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 2-1
Bernard Tomic holds a 2–1 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2015 Australian Open second round 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(6) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-3 6-4 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| May 27, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-1 6-2 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | #779 | #16 | 2,160 | 2,054 | 444 | 372 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Philipp Kohlschreiber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #86 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #62 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #28 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #27 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #34 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #22 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #24 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #34 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #29 | 1,957 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,886 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #114 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #416 | 1,662 | 0 | 7 |