H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 2-8

Richard Gasquet holds an 8–2 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 4–1 on hard courts and 3–1 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2018 Libéma Open semifinal 6-4 6-7(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 8
10 main draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #30 6-4 6-7(6) 6-2 Bernard Tomic #181 Match data Jun 16, 2018* SF Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gasquet #30 6-3 6-3 Bernard Tomic #61 Match data Jun 23, 2017* R16 Halle Open ATP 500 Grass
Bernard Tomic #20 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4 Richard Gasquet #11 Match data Oct 16, 2015* R16 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #12 6-4 6-3 6-1 Bernard Tomic #24 Match data Sep 6, 2015* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Richard Gasquet #14 6-4 3-6 6-3 Bernard Tomic #82 Match data Jun 19, 2014* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gasquet #13 6-2 6-1 7-5 Bernard Tomic #80 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Richard Gasquet #10 7-6(2) 6-4 Bernard Tomic #55 Match data Oct 4, 2013* R16 China Open ATP 500 Hard
Bernard Tomic #59 7-6(7) 5-7 7-5 7-6(5) Richard Gasquet #9 Match data Jun 30, 2013* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Richard Gasquet #10 7-6(1) 6-2 Bernard Tomic #45 Match data Mar 10, 2013* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #14 7-6(5) 6-4 Bernard Tomic #41 Match data Sep 29, 2012* QF Bangkok ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 — — — — — — — 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 110.1 -0.34 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 102.8 -1.42 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.0 -1.00 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.73 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) 98.4 +2.35 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) 98.6 +2.21 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 98.6 -0.82 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) 102.2 +1.42 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.65 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.86 +1.01 1.034 51.0% +28 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.