H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Robin Haase H2H: 1-1

Bernard Tomic and Robin Haase are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay, while Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2018 Libéma Open second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Haase #63 6-7(6) 6-2 7-5 Bernard Tomic #76 Match data May 5, 2019* Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Bernard Tomic #181 6-3 7-5 Robin Haase #44 Match data Jun 15, 2018* R16 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Robin Haase #64 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 Bernard Tomic #21 Match data Apr 22, 2016* R16 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Robin Haase
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Robin Haase
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 457/459 of Robin Haase's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Robin Haase
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Robin Haase
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.09
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.68
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.36
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) — +0.39
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) — -0.26
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.40
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) — +0.05
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.06
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.19
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.52
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.30
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.27
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.