H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Ryan Harrison H2H: 2-1
Bernard Tomic holds a 2–1 lead over Ryan Harrison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ryan Harrison leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ryan Harrison won the 2017 Madrid Masters second round 7-5 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2017* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ryan Harrison | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2016* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2012* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-4 7-6(5) | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ryan Harrison | #1,551 | #40 | 1,160 | 1,893 | 117 | 155 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Ryan Harrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #748 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #79 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #69 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #100 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #112 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #302 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #479 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |