H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Ryan Harrison H2H: 2-1

Bernard Tomic holds a 2–1 lead over Ryan Harrison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ryan Harrison leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ryan Harrison won the 2017 Madrid Open first round 7-5 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Ryan Harrison
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ryan Harrison #47 7-5 4-6 6-2 Bernard Tomic #39 Match data May 9, 2017* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Bernard Tomic #22 6-4 4-6 7-5 Ryan Harrison #115 Match data Sep 30, 2016* R16 Shenzhen ATP 250 Hard
Bernard Tomic #49 6-4 7-6(5) Ryan Harrison #58 Match data Aug 14, 2012* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ryan Harrison #1,551 #40 1,160 1,893 117 156 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Ryan Harrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #748 1,509 0 0
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 2010 4–9 30.8% #173 1,621 0 0
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2011 14–19 42.4% #79 1,730 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2012 21–21 50.0% #69 1,766 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2013 11–21 34.4% #100 1,733 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2014 5–13 27.8% #191 1,731 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2015 5–8 38.5% #112 1,682 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2016 11–11 50.0% #90 1,823 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2017 20–23 46.5% #47 1,804 0 1
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2018 21–21 50.0% #62 1,765 0 1
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2019 3–7 30.0% #302 1,666 0 1
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2020 1–1 50.0% #479 1,648 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #456 1,625 0 1
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Ryan Harrison
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2010 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 2011 13 14 27 48.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2012 11 13 24 45.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6%
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 9 14 23 39.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2015 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2016 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2017 15 13 28 53.6% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 91 108 199 45.7% 13 24 37 35.1% 13 24 37 35.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 269/273 of Ryan Harrison's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Ryan Harrison
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% 2008 2/2 3.0 3.0 54.1% 69.2% 41.5% 23.8% 83.3% 56.1% 38.8%
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% 2010 13/13 6.5 3.5 61.1% 70.0% 49.0% 63.6% 35.7% 62.0% 33.5%
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2011 33/33 6.0 4.3 56.1% 67.7% 49.7% 53.1% 41.3% 59.9% 36.5%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2012 41/42 6.5 2.7 61.3% 71.1% 52.7% 62.0% 40.6% 64.2% 35.3%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2013 32/32 7.0 3.4 58.9% 70.4% 49.8% 61.7% 36.1% 61.9% 31.0%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2014 18/18 5.2 3.3 58.9% 69.1% 47.9% 62.2% 36.8% 60.4% 32.4%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2015 12/13 4.7 3.5 59.2% 67.9% 51.2% 54.2% 47.3% 61.0% 35.0%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2016 22/22 8.0 3.3 60.1% 75.6% 53.4% 64.2% 45.3% 66.7% 34.1%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2017 42/43 7.5 3.4 59.3% 71.7% 49.8% 59.7% 40.6% 62.7% 34.5%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2018 41/42 8.8 3.3 59.4% 74.6% 52.9% 63.3% 42.8% 65.5% 33.7%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2019 10/10 9.7 3.3 59.8% 76.7% 53.4% 62.5% 41.5% 66.9% 31.5%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2020 2/2 8.5 5.0 62.4% 72.0% 45.4% 87.5% 51.4% 62.0% 39.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 4.0 4.0 52.4% 77.3% 42.5% 50.0% 7.7% 60.7% 32.3%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 269/273 7.0 3.4 59.3% 71.5% 50.9% 60.5% 41.0% 63.1% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Ryan Harrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 2008 1510 109.4 -0.50 -0.21 0.883 47.8% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.23
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 2009 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 2010 1622 121.0 -1.95 -0.93 0.883 48.0% +22 — -44 36.4% -0.64 0–2 1–6 (14%) — +0.22
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 2011 1731 142.1 -1.84 +0.18 0.911 48.2% +25 — -141 41.9% -0.56 8–5 (62%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.62
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2012 1766 144.7 +0.78 -0.97 0.986 50.1% +4 -197 -19 48.1% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.17
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2013 1733 141.2 -1.38 -3.31 0.814 47.6% +29 -163 -28 37.8% -0.88 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.47
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2014 1731 124.6 -2.06 -2.39 0.818 46.9% -6 — — 30.8% -1.03 0–4 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — -1.35
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2015 1683 136.1 -1.56 -0.20 0.896 47.9% +56 — — 37.5% -0.97 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.80
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2016 1823 145.9 +1.68 +0.07 1.026 50.5% +50 — — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.05
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2017 1804 149.1 -0.84 -0.52 0.924 48.8% +34 -212 -220 44.7% -0.27 7–4 (64%) 6–14 (30%) — -0.44
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2018 1765 140.3 +0.71 -0.88 0.975 49.6% +49 -187 -201 47.1% -0.02 9–6 (60%) 10–18 (36%) — +1.25
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2019 1666 125.9 +0.37 -1.19 0.953 49.3% +45 — — 37.5% -0.33 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.37
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2020 1648 107.2 -0.76 -0.96 1.030 52.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1626 97.4 -2.02 -0.76 0.821 45.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1622 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1601 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1893 144.8 -0.46 -1.00 0.923 48.9% +31 -195 -90 43.1% -0.38 41–44 (48%) 53–84 (39%) 92.6 -1.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.