H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 3-0
Bernard Tomic holds a 3–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2015 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2015* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-4 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2014* | Sydney | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Bernard Tomic | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |