H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Steve Johnson H2H: 0-3
Steve Johnson holds a 3–0 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Steve Johnson leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2015 Tokyo third round 6-3 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2015* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-3 2-1 (ret.) | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2015* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2015* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Steve Johnson | 6-3 7-6(4) | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |