H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 3-0
Bernard Tomic holds a 3–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2015 Bogota quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2015* | Bogota | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-1 6-4 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2014 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-3 6-4 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2012* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-1 6-2 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2011* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-7(4) 6-1 7-5 | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Tatsuma Ito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |