H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 2-3

Viktor Troicki holds a 3–2 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Viktor Troicki leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2018 Istanbul round of 32 3-6 6-0 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Viktor Troicki #71 3-6 6-0 7-5 Bernard Tomic #210 Match data May 3, 2018* R32 Istanbul ATP 250 Clay
Viktor Troicki #34 7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(4) Bernard Tomic #27 Match data May 12, 2015* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Bernard Tomic #46 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 Viktor Troicki #43 Match data Feb 20, 2015* R16 Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Bernard Tomic #58 7-6(6) 7-6(1) Viktor Troicki #16 Match data Oct 6, 2011* R32 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Viktor Troicki #18 6-4 6-4 Bernard Tomic #187 Match data Mar 13, 2011* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Viktor Troicki
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Viktor Troicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5%
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2%
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Viktor Troicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.