H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-0
Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2011 Canada Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2011* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Bernard Tomic | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |