H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Bernd Karbacher vs G. Connell H2H: 1-0
Bernd Karbacher holds a 1–0 lead over G. Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernd Karbacher leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernd Karbacher won the 1992 Miami Masters first round 7-6(2) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1992* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Bernd Karbacher | 7-6(2) 7-6(7) | G. Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernd Karbacher | #730 | #22 | 1,177 | 1,847 | 133 | 157 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| G. Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernd Karbacher | G. Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #39 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #57 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #217 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #637 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |