H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bernd Karbacher vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 2-1
Bernd Karbacher holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Bernd Karbacher leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernd Karbacher won the 1997 Kitzbuhel second round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1997* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Bernd Karbacher | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bernd Karbacher | 6-1 7-6(4) | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jaime Oncins | 6-3 2-6 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Bernd Karbacher | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernd Karbacher | #730 | #22 | 1,177 | 1,847 | 133 | 157 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernd Karbacher | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #39 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #57 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #217 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #637 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |