H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Bernie Mitton vs John Austin H2H: 0-1

John Austin holds a 1–0 lead over Bernie Mitton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Austin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Austin won the 1981 Columbus round of 16 6-1 6-2.

RSA Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Austin 6-1 6-2 Bernie Mitton Match data Aug 7, 1981* R16 Columbus ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernie Mitton #766 #42 0 1,827 206 223 48.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
John Austin 1,771 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernie Mitton John Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,452 0 0
18 1973 11–4 73.3% #179 1,620 0 0
19 1974 5–5 50.0% #161 1,618 0 0
20 1975 20–19 51.3% #51 1,769 0 0
21 1976 16–21 43.2% #65 1,767 0 0
22 1977 23–32 41.8% #76 1,690 0 0
23 1978 36–31 53.7% #62 1,729 0 1
24 1979 29–26 52.7% #58 1,754 0 2
25 1980 28–29 49.1% #60 1,689 0 2
26 1981 13–19 40.6% #94 1,618 0 2
27 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,592 0 2
28 1983 13–16 44.8% #100 1,615 0 2
29 1984 4–8 33.3% #243 1,615 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernie Mitton John Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1971 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1973 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1973 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1976 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1974 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1975 10 6 16 62.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1976 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1977 7 11 18 38.9% 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1978 10 9 19 52.6% 1 7 8 12.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 1981 12 9 21 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1979 16 9 25 64.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 10 12 16.7% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1980 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 9 20 55.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1981 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1983 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 80 78 158 50.6% 32 48 80 40.0% 42 36 78 53.8% 52 61 113 46.0% 26 31 57 45.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 15 20 25.0% 12 22 34 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernie Mitton John Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1971 1498 107.2 0.0% -3.50 -0.26
15 1973 1501 100.3 60.0% +1.20 0–1 0–1 +0.43
16 1971 1476 98.9 25.0% -1.50 1–0 -0.03 1974 1552 108.7 +72 63.6% +0.54 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.2 +0.64
17 1972 1453 99.3 25.0% -1.00 0–1 -0.01
18 1973 1620 117.8 -40 +45 65.0% +0.73 3–1 (75%) +2.06 1976 1515 94.2 0.0% -3.25 +0.47
19 1974 1618 122.7 -11 +31 50.0% +0.32 0–1 0–1 +0.84 1977 1509 112.4 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 -0.30
20 1975 1769 147.6 +16 -189 -71 52.3% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 0–3 (0%) 94.2 -1.56 1978 1579 133.8 +76 -63 37.3% -0.67 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.8 +0.39
21 1976 1767 139.9 +10 -219 -13 48.4% -0.12 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 96.8 -1.92 1979 1567 125.0 +46 -27 34.0% -1.17 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 +0.37
22 1977 1691 147.0 +38 -50 +7 42.1% -0.36 10–8 (56%) 4–7 (36%) 103.6 -5.59 1980 1721 131.1 -31 -109 50.0% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 103.2 -0.09
23 1978 1730 140.2 +36 -163 +100 54.1% +0.07 12–16 (43%) 13–6 (68%) 102.0 +1.76 1981 1749 143.2 +35 -177 48.1% -0.21 5–3 (63%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -2.01
24 1979 1754 138.0 -3 -152 +74 50.4% +0.16 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 105.8 +1.29 1982 1659 109.4 +32 0.0% -3.27 0–3 (0%) -1.11
25 1980 1689 138.1 +25 -92 +105 48.6% +0.15 11–10 (52%) 6–14 (30%) 93.8 +1.90 1983 1579 98.0 16.7% -2.00 0–1 0–3 (0%) +0.39
26 1981 1619 131.7 +55 +59 40.8% -0.26 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 96.1 +0.87 1984 1559 98.5 0.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.26
27 1982 1593 116.0 +74 -15 +33 45.7% -0.35 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +1.86
28 1983 1615 124.3 +25 -22 49.3% -0.26 3–9 (25%) 8–6 (57%) 95.6 +1.68 1986 1540 97.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.19
29 1984 1616 122.3 -2 +7 37.5% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) -0.98
Career 1827 143.0 +25 -104 +57 48.7% -0.04 64–75 (46%) 57–69 (45%) 95.6 +0.51 1771 135.8 +32 -63 -105 39.6% -0.70 17–18 (49%) 20–25 (44%) 100.0 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.