H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Bill Freer vs Hank Irvine H2H: 1-1

Bill Freer and Hank Irvine are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hank Irvine won the 1971 South African Open round of 64 3-6 6-7 6-3 7-6 6-0.

RSA Right-Handed
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
ZIM Age 83 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hank Irvine 3-6 6-7 6-3 7-6 6-0 Bill Freer Match data Apr 7, 1971* R64 South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Bill Freer 3-6 6-2 1-6 6-3 6-3 Hank Irvine Match data Apr 17, 1969* R32 Durban ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Freer #511 #237 0 1,540 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hank Irvine 1,534 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Bill Freer Hank Irvine
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 2–2 50.0% 1,519 0 0
1970 3–5 37.5% 1,523 0 0
1971 2–7 22.2% 1,467 0 0
1972 3–2 60.0% 1,507 0 0
1973 0–1 0.0% 1,501 0 0
1974 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
1975 0–4 0.0% #238 1,464 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Bill Freer Hank Irvine
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 2 2 4 50.0% 1968 0 1 1 0.0%
1970 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
1971 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1972 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 1 0 1 100.0%
1974 0 1 1 0.0%
1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% Career 4 9 13 30.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 8 12 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Bill Freer Hank Irvine
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1520 96.3 +73 37.5% -1.31 2–0 +0.23 1968 1479 101.2 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0.00
1970 1523 101.5 -1 +22 35.0% -1.45 1–0 +0.17 1969 1453 105.4 +89 +34 39.1% -0.04 1–1 +0.72
1971 1468 94.4 +61 +39 +26 33.3% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) +0.48 1970 1464 114.1 +29 36.8% -0.53 0–2 -0.42
1972 1507 105.5 +74 53.3% +1.07 1–0 0–1 +0.30 1971 1462 107.4 +45 +26 +40 37.5% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 3–6 (33%) 95.2 +0.82
1973 1501 102.4 0.0% -2.67 -0.16 1972 1503 102.4 54.5% +0.09 1–0 2–0 +0.33
1974 1484 97.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.13
1975 1464 113.9 +79 0.0% -3.00 -0.27
Career 1540 102.7 +72 +19 +24 33.0% -1.21 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +2.75 Career 1535 110.6 +57 +30 +35 39.6% -0.31 3–7 (30%) 5–6 (45%) 95.3 +4.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.