H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Angel Gimenez H2H: 0-1
Angel Gimenez holds a 1–0 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angel Gimenez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angel Gimenez won the 1981 Forest Hills Wct second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 70
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1981* | Forest Hills Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Angel Gimenez | 6-3 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Angel Gimenez | #806 | #41 | 0 | 1,777 | 86 | 106 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Angel Gimenez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #332 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #42 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #195 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #86 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |