H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 1-1
Bill Scanlon and Heinz Gunthardt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet, while Heinz Gunthardt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Heinz Gunthardt won the 1985 Geneva third round 6-2 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 67
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1985* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Heinz Gunthardt | 6-2 6-7 6-1 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Dec 4, 1982* | Chicago-2 Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 7-6 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Heinz Gunthardt | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,966 | 225 | 189 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Heinz Gunthardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #38 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #36 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,663 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |