H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-0
Bill Scanlon holds a 2–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1976 Hampton fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1976* | Hampton | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-1 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1976* | Salisbury | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-2 6-3 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |