H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Mark Dickson H2H: 1-4

Mark Dickson holds a 4–1 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mark Dickson leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1984 Houston Wct semifinal 6-4 7-5.

USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 7, 1984* Houston Wct ATP 250 SF Clay Mark Dickson #53 6-4 7-5 Bill Scanlon #17 Match data
Feb 10, 1984* Richmond Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Mark Dickson #66 7-5 6-3 Bill Scanlon #10 Match data
Sep 10, 1983* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Bill Scanlon #17 3-6 6-4 4-6 6-3 7-6 Mark Dickson #96 Match data
Mar 19, 1983* Munich Wct ATP 250 SF Carpet Mark Dickson #40 6-3 6-0 Bill Scanlon #30 Match data
Oct 14, 1982* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Dickson #38 7-6 6-2 Bill Scanlon #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,017 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,817 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Mark Dickson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,651 0 0
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,723 0 0
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,764 0 1 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,839 0 2 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,689 0 0
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,808 0 2 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,879 0 5 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,810 0 2
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,852 0 6 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,923 0 6 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,828 0 6 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,618 0 2
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,668 0 6 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,534 0 7
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,598 0 7