H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Mark Dickson H2H: 1-4
Mark Dickson holds a 4–1 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mark Dickson leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1984 Houston Wct semifinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1984* | Houston Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Mark Dickson | 6-4 7-5 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1984* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Dickson | 7-5 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Sep 10, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 3-6 6-4 4-6 6-3 7-6 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1983* | Munich Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Mark Dickson | 6-3 6-0 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1982* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Dickson | 7-6 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |