H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 3-0

Bill Scanlon holds a 3–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1981 Los Angeles Open round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #33 6-1 6-3 Mark Edmondson #74 Match data Apr 17, 1981* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Bill Scanlon #40 6-4 1-6 6-3 Mark Edmondson Match data Nov 17, 1979* QF Taipei ATP 250 Carpet
Bill Scanlon #72 6-1 6-3 Mark Edmondson #65 Match data Apr 20, 1979* R16 San Jose ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Mark Edmondson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,500 0 0
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,755 1 2
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2 1977 16–24 40.0% #92 1,602 1 2
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,685 1 3
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,742 1 3
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,715 1 3
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,708 1 6
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,573 1 6
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,539 1 6
33 — — — — — — — 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bill Scanlon Mark Edmondson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 19 20 39 48.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 1978 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1979 4 5 9 44.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 1980 4 5 9 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1981 14 8 22 63.6% 9 9 18 50.0% 25 4 29 86.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 8 16 50.0%
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0%
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — —
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4% — 50 58 108 46.3% 59 76 135 43.7% 102 58 160 63.8% 33 39 72 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bill Scanlon Mark Edmondson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
19 1976 1654 142.6 — — — — -38 -5 — 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1725 137.5 — — — — +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) — +2.62 1974 1489 104.0 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.03
21 1978 1766 135.3 — — — — +66 -179 — 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.30 1975 1501 106.2 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — +0.53
22 1979 1838 143.2 — — — — +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.44 1976 1756 137.6 — — — — -128 -137 +160 56.1% +0.33 14–13 (52%) 18–8 (69%) — +4.22
23 1980 1810 150.9 — — — — +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) — -5.33 1977 1603 131.0 — — — — -25 +7 +221 47.7% +0.01 4–13 (24%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.28
24 1981 1881 150.7 — — — — +56 — -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.11 1978 1686 136.0 — — — — -115 -93 +199 47.3% -0.14 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.12
25 1982 1850 150.4 — — — — +33 -212 — 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.56 1979 1743 144.3 — — — — -89 -149 +141 51.5% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.24
26 1983 1925 157.4 — — — — +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) — -3.38 1980 1715 129.3 — — — — -68 -118 +111 46.5% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.75
27 1984 1830 139.9 — — — — -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.20 1981 1902 144.4 — — — — -56 -267 +89 62.4% +0.73 23–9 (72%) 20–5 (80%) — +2.48
28 1985 1669 116.8 — — — — +90 — +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.21 1982 1709 130.9 — — — — +33 -109 +214 51.2% -0.06 5–5 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.35
29 1986 1657 124.4 — — — — +15 — +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +2.27 1983 1688 128.5 — — — — +28 -69 +179 48.2% -0.14 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.63
30 1987 1562 119.1 — — — — +53 — +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) — +2.59 1984 1573 121.2 — — — — -16 +69 +224 39.1% -0.94 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.75
31 1988 1535 117.2 — — — — +7 — +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.45 1985 1595 118.9 — — — — — +47 +142 42.9% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.58
32 1989 1600 129.3 — — — — +18 — — 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -1.52 1986 1540 111.0 — — — — -29 — +155 30.0% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1550 100.5 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.34
Career — 2018 148.5 — — — — +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67 — 1927 139.1 — — — — -40 -114 +151 50.9% +0.02 81–74 (52%) 86–63 (58%) 105.9 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.