H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Matt Mitchell H2H: 2-0
Bill Scanlon holds a 2–0 lead over Matt Mitchell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1983 Columbus fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1983* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-3 6-2 | Matt Mitchell | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Bill Scanlon | 6-2 6-1 | Matt Mitchell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Matt Mitchell | #920 | #53 | 0 | 1,717 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Matt Mitchell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #196 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #239 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #96 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #85 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #799 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |