H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Michael Westphal H2H: 1-1
Bill Scanlon and Michael Westphal are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet, while Michael Westphal leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1984 Madrid fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1984* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-2 6-4 | Michael Westphal | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1982* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Michael Westphal | 6-4 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Michael Westphal | #1,050 | #49 | 81 | 1,754 | 73 | 97 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Michael Westphal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #73 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #279 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #233 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |