H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bill Scanlon vs Mike Estep H2H: 1-1

Bill Scanlon and Mike Estep are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Estep leads 1–0 on carpet, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike Estep won the 1981 Taipei round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mike Estep
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mike Estep 6-3 6-2 Bill Scanlon #40 Match data Nov 13, 1981* R16 Taipei ATP 250 Carpet
Bill Scanlon #25 6-0 6-3 Mike Estep Match data Jan 9, 1981* R16 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Mike Estep #409 #59 0 1,760 118 182 39.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bill Scanlon Mike Estep
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1968 5–7 41.7% — 1,502 0 0
19 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0 1969 3–12 20.0% — 1,409 0 0
20 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0 1970 3–5 37.5% — 1,446 0 0
21 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1 1971 1–8 11.1% — 1,425 0 0
22 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2 1972 13–13 50.0% — 1,543 0 0
23 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2 1973 26–31 45.6% #75 1,628 0 1
24 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5 1974 15–24 38.5% #98 1,632 0 1
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6 1975 15–27 35.7% #106 1,630 0 1
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6 1976 16–15 51.6% #81 1,659 0 2
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6 1977 3–7 30.0% #142 1,638 0 2
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7 1980 1–2 33.3% #203 1,643 0 2
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,570 0 2
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7 1982 11–15 42.3% #93 1,542 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% #100 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bill Scanlon Mike Estep
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
19 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — —
20 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 1970 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1971 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9% 1973 12 10 22 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 1974 6 9 15 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1975 6 7 13 46.2% 4 11 15 26.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 1976 9 5 14 64.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4% — 46 52 98 46.9% 15 55 70 21.4% 43 37 80 53.8% 14 38 52 26.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bill Scanlon Mike Estep
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1502 100.1 — — — — +67 -53 +50 46.9% -0.41 2–2 (50%) — — +0.09
19 1976 1654 142.6 — — — — -38 -5 — 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.46 1969 1410 100.7 — — — — — +15 +53 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) — — -0.15
20 1977 1725 137.5 — — — — +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) — +2.62 1970 1447 103.2 — — — — +187 -47 — 35.3% -1.23 1–0 — — -0.30
21 1978 1766 135.3 — — — — +66 -179 — 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.30 1971 1425 109.4 — — — — +130 — — 26.1% -1.39 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.89
22 1979 1838 143.2 — — — — +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.44 1972 1544 115.5 — — — — +4 -148 +40 51.6% +0.34 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +1.18
23 1980 1810 150.9 — — — — +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) — -5.33 1973 1629 123.4 — — — — -7 -242 +77 47.8% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 9–7 (56%) — +3.20
24 1981 1881 150.7 — — — — +56 — -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.11 1974 1632 132.3 — — — — -25 -211 +58 42.2% -0.19 4–6 (40%) 3–18 (14%) — -1.01
25 1982 1850 150.4 — — — — +33 -212 — 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.56 1975 1631 124.2 — — — — -28 -167 +109 36.5% -1.05 9–4 (69%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.53
26 1983 1925 157.4 — — — — +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) — -3.38 1976 1659 128.6 — — — — +23 — +64 51.8% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.28
27 1984 1830 139.9 — — — — -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.20 1977 1638 118.0 — — — — -11 — — 30.8% -0.92 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.24
28 1985 1669 116.8 — — — — +90 — +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1657 124.4 — — — — +15 — +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1562 119.1 — — — — +53 — +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) — +2.59 1980 1644 109.6 — — — — — — — 44.4% -1.22 — 1–1 — -0.15
31 1988 1535 117.2 — — — — +7 — +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.45 1981 1570 108.7 — — — — +63 -179 +68 33.3% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.36
32 1989 1600 129.3 — — — — +18 — — 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -1.52 1982 1542 117.9 — — — — +35 — +95 40.0% -0.86 6–2 (75%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1537 102.7 — — — — +39 — — 33.3% -1.80 2–1 (67%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.31
Career — 2018 148.5 — — — — +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67 — 1760 124.5 — — — — +10 -153 +67 41.7% -0.54 45–48 (48%) 39–48 (45%) 101.5 +1.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.