H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Mike Estep H2H: 1-1
Bill Scanlon and Mike Estep are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Estep leads 1–0 on carpet, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike Estep won the 1981 Taipei fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1981* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mike Estep | 6-3 6-2 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1981* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-0 6-3 | Mike Estep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mike Estep | #409 | #59 | 0 | 1,760 | 120 | 184 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Mike Estep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #81 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #212 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #93 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |